|
Post by Ms B. on Jun 29, 2007 10:53:28 GMT 10
I thought I'd start a thread here after what ArgyrosfeniX posted linkIt's an idea and possibly a good one I think. What does everyone else think?
|
|
|
Post by Fae kitty on Jun 29, 2007 15:03:55 GMT 10
I think it's a good idea but perhaps it shouldn't be enforced until there are more members otherwise the riddles may never get solved what with & all
|
|
|
Post by ArgyrosfeniX on Jun 29, 2007 21:24:08 GMT 10
I think that missing only one would be good. Or we could do something like a 48 hour head start? Maybe 72 hour? That might make it easier for others to answer, but still allow those of us that love doing these sorts of things to keep the ball rolling.
|
|
|
Post by Ms B. on Jun 30, 2007 9:55:35 GMT 10
How about we trial it and see how it goes depending on how many people play.
We'll start with the winner not playing the next round, yeah?
|
|
|
Post by Ms B. on Jun 30, 2007 10:07:08 GMT 10
Btw I modified the rules for how long you have to wait until your next turn. It's now 12 hours rather then 24... Such a pain aren't I? Remember it's all a trial
|
|
|
Post by Ms B. on Jul 9, 2007 10:30:45 GMT 10
I think rather then missing the next game the winner might just get a delayed start instead. I don't think we have enough members to have players missing turns.
So I think trialing a 24 hour head start for everyone else and then having the winner go after that might be better
|
|